Statutory interpretation is essential for judges to...

Statutory interpretation is essential for judges primarily because it allows them to adjudicate cases based on existing laws. When a case comes before a court, judges must interpret the language of statutes to ascertain legislative intent and apply the law accurately to the specific facts of the case at hand. This process involves examining the wording of the statute, considering its context, the purpose behind it, and how it fits within the broader legal framework.

The role of judges in statutory interpretation is crucial because laws are often written in ambiguous or complex language, which can lead to different interpretations. By engaging in statutory interpretation, judges ensure that the law is implemented consistently and fairly, reflecting the intentions of the legislature while also adhering to legal principles.

In contrast, while formulating new laws is a function of the legislative branch, conducting jury trials is a procedural aspect of the judicial system that doesn't directly relate to statutory interpretation, and preparing legal briefs is primarily a task for attorneys, not judges. Thus, the ability to interpret statutes is central to the judicial function and vital for the resolution of legal disputes based on the law as it stands.